知识产权许可使用权对第三人效力研究  

Research on the Effect of the Exploitation Right of Intellectual Property Licensee on the Third Party

作　　者：张鹏[1] ZHANG Peng

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《北方法学》2020年第6期66-76,共11页Northern Legal Science

摘　　要：为了加强对知识产权被许可人的保护,应允许专有许可使用权具有对世排他效力。其中,因权利人的处分行为而发生的排他权转移效果在实体法上是专有许可被许可人得以独立向侵权人行使诉权的基础。权利人在同一许可条件下多次发放专有许可的,在后专有许可构成无权处分。在排他权意义上,在后专有许可被许可人不享有任何权益;在使用权意义上,在后专有许可被许可人是否可以对抗在先专有许可被许可人取决于在先专有许可是否进行了公示。在公示手段与对抗效力的关系上,商标权、专利权、著作权间存在不同考量。非专有许可的被许可人不享有独立的诉权,但可对抗在后受让人与破产管理人而继续使用。In order to strengthen the protection of the exploitation right of IP licensee,the special right of use should be allowed to have exclusive effects. Among them,the effect of the transfer of exclusive rights due to the disposition of the right holder is the basis for the exclusive license to independently exercise the right of action against the infringer in the substantive law. If the right holder issues multiple exclusive license under the same license conditions,subsequent exclusive license constitutes unauthorized disposal. In the sense of exclusivity,the latter licensee does not enjoy any rights;in the sense of exploitation,whether the subsequent licensee’s conduct can exert against the previous licensee depends on whether the prior exclusive license has been publicized. There are different considerations among trademark rights,patent rights,and copyrights in the relationship between publicity means and adversarial effectiveness. The non-exclusive licensees do not enjoy independent litigation rights,but can continue to enjoy the exploitation right against subsequent assignees and insolvency administrators.

关 键 词：知识产权 许可使用 第三人效力 买卖不破许可 

分 类 号：DF523[政治法律—民商法学]