检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张敏[1] 丁昉[1] 孙湛 锁涛[1] 黄丽红 胡永[1] 钟鸣[1] 宋洁琼[1] ZHANG Min;DING Fang;SUN Zhan(Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China)
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属中山医院,上海200032 [2]复旦大学附属中山医院医务处,上海200032
出 处:《中国卫生质量管理》2020年第6期46-49,共4页Chinese Health Quality Management
基 金:上海市卫生健康委卫生行业临床研究专项(青年)(20194Y0239)“基于信息化建设的静脉血栓院内防治管理体系的探索与实践”。
摘 要:通过文献研究,总结国内外静脉血栓栓塞症各类评估工具的优缺点及适用范围。指出我国与欧美国家人群存在种族、疾病谱和遗传因素等方面的差异,国外量表所纳入的危险因素并不一定能准确、完整地反映我国患者的风险状况。应借鉴国外评估工具的构建方法,基于我国VTE患者数据进行多中心、大样本的回顾性研究,从而构建更适合我国人群的、更准确的VTE风险评估模型。The study summarized the advantages,disadvantages and application scope of various evaluation tools for venous thromboembolism(VTE)at home and abroad through literature review.It was pointed out that there were differences between Chinese and European and American populations in terms of race,disease spectrum and genetic factors.The risk factors included in foreign scales may not accurately and completely reflect the risk status of Chinese patients.A multi-center,large-sample retrospective study should be conducted based on the data of VTE patients in China by referring to the construction methods of assessment tools abroad,so as to build a more suitable and accurate VTE risk assessment model for Chinese population.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229