检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王淑萍[1] 李宝华[1] 金文兰[1] 郝尚婷 王永红 侯岩 WANG Shuping;LI Baohua;JIN Wenlan;HAO Shangting;WANG Yonghong;HOU Yan(Daxing District People′s Hospital of Beijing,Beijing 102611,China)
出 处:《国际检验医学杂志》2020年第S02期8-10,共3页International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基 金:大兴区人民医院科技项目(420194330)。
摘 要:目的探讨在重度颅脑损伤患者转出重症监护室(ICU)的常规护理基础上进行肺部延续护理干预,对降低非计划72 h ICU重返率的效果。方法选取2018年8月至2019年7月于该院ICU治疗并转出的符合条件的50例重度颅脑损伤患者作为观察组,回顾2017年8月至2018年7月于该院ICU治疗并转出的符合纳入标准的42例重度颅脑损伤患者,作为对照组。对照组给予常规护理,观察组在常规护理的基础上进行肺部延续性护理。结果观察组的72 h重返ICU率为4.76%,对照组72 h重返率为30.95%,研究组明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对转出ICU的重度颅脑损伤患者进行肺部延续护理干预,可以明显降低患者的ICU重返率。Objective To explore the effect of continuous lung nursing intervention on the basis of routine nursing for severe brain injury patients transferred out of ICU,and to reduce the return rate of unplanned 72 hours ICU.Methods Fifty eligible patients with severe brain injury who were treated and transferred out of ICU from August 2018 to July 2019 were selected as the observation group.Forty-two patients with severe brain injury who were treated and transferred out of ICU from August 2017 to July 2018 were reviewed as the control group.The control group was given routine nursing,and the observation group was given lung continuous nursing on the basis of routine nursing.Results The rate of returning to ICU was 4.76%in the observation group and 30.95%in the control group,which was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Continuous lung nursing intervention for severe brain injury patients transferred out of ICU can significantly reduce the ICU return rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28