客观知识的科技风险沟通作用真的失效了么——兼论转基因技术科普策略的选择  

Does the Objective Knowledge Really not Work——Questions on the Way of Science Popularization of GM Technology

作　　者：庞祯敬 蒋鼎汗 Pang Zhenjing;Jiang Dinghan(School of Public Policy&Management,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China;School of Statistics&Mathematics,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学公共管理学院,北京100084 [2]中南财经政法大学统计与数学学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《中国科技论坛》2020年第12期144-153,163,共11页Forum on Science and Technology in China

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目(19XZZ007);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(20YJA630068)。

摘　　要：本研究通过预置模型、问卷调查、结构方程,对客观知识对转基因技术风险沟通的作用机制进行探索。研究发现,客观知识对转基因技术风险沟通不具有显著直接效应,而主观知识可精准地替代客观知识,对转基因技术风险感知有显著预测作用,客观知识、主观知识能分别通过启发科学理性和削弱社会理性的机制作用于风险感知,从而间接影响转基因技术的公众态度。当前阶段转基因技术科普的核心是知识合法性的优先确立,以为公众理解和公众参与阶段奠定基础。This paper explores the mechanism of objective knowledge on risk communication of GM technology by preset models,questionnaires and structural equations.It is found that objective knowledge has no significant direct effect on the risk communication of GM technology,while subjective knowledge can accurately replace objective knowledge,which has a significant predictive effect on the risk perception of GM technology.Objective knowledge and subjective knowledge can indirectly affect the public attitudes of GM technology through the mechanism of enlightening scientific rationality and weakening social rationality.At present,the core of the popularization of GM technology is to establish the legitimacy of knowledge in order to lay the foundation for public understanding and public participation.

关 键 词：转基因技术 客观知识 科学理性 社会理性 风险感知 

分 类 号：G315[文化科学]