钒钛磁铁矿尾矿资源调查取样方法比较——以红格尾矿库为例  

Comparison of Sampling Methods for Investigation of Vanadium-titanium Magnetite Tailings Resources--Taking Hongge Tailings Pond as an Example

作　　者：李潇雨[1,2,3] 朱志敏 周家云[1,2] 刘应冬[1] 陈超 Li Xiaoyu;Zhu Zhimin;Zhou Jiayun;Liy Yingdong;Chen Chao(Institute of Comprehensive Utilization of Mineral Resources,CAGS,Chengdu,Sichuan,China;Application Technology Innovation Center of Rare Earth Resources,China Geological Survey,Chengdu,Sichuan,China;Institute of Sedimentary Geology,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu,Sichuan,China)

机构地区：[1]中国地质科学院矿产综合利用研究所,四川成都610041 [2]中国地质调查局稀土资源应用技术创新中心,四川成都610041 [3]成都理工大学沉积地质研究院,四川成都610000

出　　处：《矿产综合利用》2020年第6期96-99,47,共5页Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources

摘　　要：根据尾矿库的资源特征分析,结合红格老尾矿库的研究实例,比较了尾矿资源调查2种取样方法的优缺点,结果表明概查取样不能全面的反应尾矿库资源特征,而详查取样可以兼顾到尾矿库的底部和中部,可客观反应尾矿库整体资源特征,建议在经费许可的前提下采用详查取样。According to the analysis of characteristics of tailings resources,by combining with all the research samples about Hongge tailings and through the comparison of the tailings resource investigation and the advantages and disadvantages of the two sampling methods,the results show that generalized survey samplings cannot fully reflect the features of the tailing resources,but the detailed survey sampling can give arrive at the bottom of the tailings and central,which can objectively reflect the features of whole tailing resources.Therefore,Detailed survey sampling are suggested on the premise of funding permssion.

关 键 词：钒钛磁铁矿 尾矿 资源调查 取样方法 

分 类 号：TD951[矿业工程—选矿]