检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:骆旭旭[1] LUO Xu-xu
出 处:《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2020年第6期93-102,115,共11页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
基 金:福建省社会科学基金一般项目“中国与‘一带一路’沿线国家区域竞争法合作制度研究”(FJ2017B006);华侨大学国家社会科学基金培育项目“自由贸易协定的竞争法合作机制研究”(501020302)。
摘 要:构建“一带一路”沿线自由贸易区是“一带一路”倡议制度化和法治化的主要方式,也是我国提出新议题国际经济规则的主要实践平台。作为边境后经贸议题,“一带一路”国际竞争规则对于协调区域竞争法差异,形成“一带一路”大市场具有重要意义。我国自由贸易协定的竞争规则呈现出从分散竞争条款、单一竞争条款向实体竞争专章三个阶段发展的演进路径。竞争议题覆盖比例少,未形成中国范式是“一带一路”竞争议题的主要问题。竞争规则演进动力在于区域经济一体化的推动,并受制于缔约双方的制度供给能力。结合“一带一路”的区域一体化进程,我国应倡导多元化和合作优先的“一带一路”国际竞争规则,侧重于完善竞争执法合作程序条款,形成中国范式的“一带一路”国际竞争规则。The free trade agreement,as the main practice platform to put forward international economic rule of China,is the key way to institutionalize and legalize the the Belt and Road initiative.The competition issue in the free trade agreement significantly contributes to the construction of the market of the Belt and Road initiative.The competition provisions of China’s free trade agreement represent the process of three stages from odd and single provision to competition chapter,while the small number and lack of paradigm is the main problem of competition issue in China’s Free Trade Agreement.The driving force of the evolution of competition rules lies in the promotion of regional economic integration and is subject to the institutional supply capacity of both parties.Combined with the regional integration process of the Belt and Road,China should advocate the international competition rules of the Belt and Road with diversification and cooperation as the priority,and focus on improving the procedural provisions for cooperative law enforcement in competition,so as to form the“One Belt and One Road”international competition rules of the Chinese paradigm.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.126.57