检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邱春艳[1] 黄军[1] QIU Chunyan;HUANG Jun(Research Office of Weightlifing,Wrestling and Judo,School of Sports and Education,Shandong Sport University,Rizhao 276826,Shandong,China)
机构地区:[1]山东体育学院竞技体育与体育教育学院举摔柔教研室,山东日照276826
出 处:《山东体育科技》2020年第5期35-39,共5页Shandong Sports Science & Technology
摘 要:运用文献资料、录像分析、对比分析等方法,以里约奥运会中国男子柔道-90公斤级选手程训钊及本级别前三名选手的技战术为研究对象,对他们在场上所运用的技术和战术进行分析研究。通过分析比较希望掌握我国男子柔道与世界顶尖选手的技战术差距和现在男子柔道的发展趋势。发现我国选手,在力量上不如格鲁吉亚选手,防守能力上不如韩国选手,技术细腻程度上较日本选手稍差些,但是综合能力比较全面。在战术方面,战术运用较好的是日本及韩国选手,我国选手与国外选手相比,战术意识、临场的战术变化安排较合理。Based on the methods of documentary data,video analysis and comparative analysis,this paper studied the Chinese men's judo at the Rio Olympic Games in China(-90 kg)and the top three judo players of this level.By analyzing and studying the techniques and tactics used by them in the field,the author hopes to find out the technical and tactical gap between Chinese men's judo and the world's top players,and the development trend of the sport.It is found that Cheng is not as strong as the Georgian player,his defensive ability is not as good as the Korean player,and his technical sophistication is a little lower than that of the Japanese player,but his comprehensive ability is more comprehensive.In terms of tactics,the better use of tactics is made by Japanese and Korean players.Compared with foreign players,China’s tactical awareness and on-field tactical change arrangement are more reasonable.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166