检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈刚[1] Chen Gang
机构地区:[1]中国人民公安大学国家安全与反恐怖学院,北京100238
出 处:《法学杂志》2020年第12期1-17,共17页Law Science Magazine
基 金:中国人民公安大学国家安全高精尖学科资助项目“大数据侦查的解释与规制”(项目编号:2020GDLW007)的最终成果。
摘 要:从"大数据侦查"的生成沿革及目标、技术、形式的概念结构考察出发,以权利干预为基本分析视角,将强制性与任意性、秘密性与公开性作为判断基准,有助于从实质上分析其法律属性。既有法律框架对大数据侦查解释力有限,且大数据侦查在行为正当性根基、程序正义维护、证据规则适用以及司法公正实现方面存在多重困境。有必要在程序法定及谦抑原则的分析框架内,对其程序控制的构建进路、证明机理的阐释与衔接、技术异化的制度干预等问题进行探讨与展望,以实现理性规制目的。It will be helpful to analyze the legal attribute of"big data investigation"starting from the study of its generation,and conceptual structure of objective,technology and form,taking the rights intervention as the basic analysis perspective,and using compulsion and arbitrariness along with secrecy and openness as the judgment benchmark.The existing legal framework has limited explanatory power to big data investigation,and big data investigation has multiple difficulties in the foundation of behavior legitimacy,the maintenance of procedural justice,the application of evidence rules,and the realization of judicial justice.Therefore,it is necessary to discuss the construction approach of procedural control,the explanation and connection of proof mechanism,and the institutional intervention of technological alienation within the framework of the analysis of the principle of procedure and modesty,so as to realize the rational regulation of big data investigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33