新闻出版者权作为一项新型邻接权:欧盟经验与本土选择  

Press Publishers Right as a New Neighboring Right—EU Experience and Local Choice

作　　者：谭洋 Tan Yang

机构地区：[1]广东技术师范大学法学与知识产权学院

出　　处：《南大法学》2020年第4期148-166,共19页NanJing University Law Journal

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金)(20XNO001)资助。

摘　　要：数字化时代,用户已从阅读纸质新闻转向数字新闻,信息社会服务提供商向用户提供新闻的标题、摘录、片段和缩略图等部分内容,而用户仅阅读这些内容便可完成对新闻的消费,不再点击链接去访问新闻的来源网站,新闻出版者因而遭受较大损失。对此,欧盟及其成员国创设了一种新的邻接权即新闻出版者权予以回应。基于我国新闻出版业现状,从谨慎扩张邻接权体系、新闻出版者已获得多种保护且内部存在分化、作者收入增加的不确定性、新闻出版者权对信息社会服务提供商带来极大挑战、新闻出版者权会阻碍技术进步和商业模式创新,以及不利于信息流动和新闻真实等角度出发,我国不应当引入该邻接权,可适用反不正当竞争法或采用经济手段等方式来回应新闻出版者的诉求。In the digital age,users have shifted from reading paper news to digital news,and information society service providers provide users with news headlines,excerpts,clips and thumbnails.Users can complete the consumption of a news item by simply reading the news headline,excerpt or clip,instead of clicking the link to access the source website of the news.Thus,press publishers have suffered large losses.So the European Union and its member states created a new type of neighboring right called“press publishers rights”to respond.Based on the current status of China s press and publishing industry,considering the careful expansion of the neighboring rights system,the news publishers having obtained multiple protections and internal differentiation,the uncertainty of increasing authors income,press publishers right posing great challenges to information society service providers,and press publishers right hindering technological progress and business model innovation,as well as not conducive to information flow and authenticity of news,China should not introduce the neighboring right,and can respond to the demands of news publishers by applying anti-unfair competition laws or adopting economic means.

关 键 词：新闻出版者权 邻接权 链接 《数字化单一市场版权指令》 

分 类 号：D923.41[政治法律—民商法学] D95[政治法律—法学] DD913