检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李飞 陈文[1] LI Fei;CHEN Wen(Department of Nephrology,Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University,Haikou 570311,China)
机构地区:[1]海南医学院第二附属医院肾内科,海口570311
出 处:《临床与病理杂志》2020年第11期2975-2981,共7页Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research
摘 要:目的:探讨循证护理对腹膜透析患者心血管事件发生以及生存质量的影响。方法:回顾性分析海南医学院第二附属医院肾内科135例患者的病例资料:应用循证护理前(2016年2月至2017年1月,应用前组,n=65),应用循证护理后(2017年2月至2018年1月,应用后组,n=70)。应用前组采用常规护理干预,应用后组采用循证护理干预,比较两组腹膜透析效果、心血管事件的发生情况、焦虑自评量表(Self-rating Anxiety Scale,SAS)与抑郁自评量表(Self-rating Depression Scale,SDS)以及生活质量评分。结果:应用后组干预后尿素清除指数(urea clearance index,KT/V)、血清白蛋白、血红蛋白均高于应用前组,组间差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);应用后组心血管事件发生率为11.43%(8/70)低于应用前组的26.15%(17/65),组间差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.843,P=0.028);应用后组心血管事件病死率为2.86%(2/70)低于应用前组的15.38%(10/65),组间差异具有统计学意义(χ2=6.531,P=0.011);应用后组干预后SAS和SDS评分均低于应用前组,组间差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);应用后组干预后生存质量各项评分均高于应用前组,组间差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论:循证护理对腹膜透析患者干预效果良好,可有效减少心血管事件的发生,提高患者生存质量。Objective:To investigate the effects of evidence-based nursing on occurrence of cardiovascular events and quality of life in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.Methods:The retrospective analysis was performed on 135 case data in nephrology department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University:65 patients who were not given evidence-based nursing from February 2016 to January 2017(pre-application group)and 70 patients who were given evidence-based nursing from February 2017 to January 2018(post-application group).The pre-application group was given routine nursing intervention,while post-application group was given evidence-based nursing intervention.The peritoneal dialysis effect,occurrence of cardiovascular events,scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS)and quality of life were compared between the two groups.Results:After intervention,urea clearance index(KT/V),serum albumin and hemoglobin in postapplication group were higher than those in pre-application group(all P<0.05).The incidence of cardiovascular events in post-application group was lower than that in pre-application group[11.43%(8/70)vs 26.15%(17/65)](χ2=4.843,P=0.028).The mortality rate of cardiovascular events in post-application group was lower than that in pre-application group[2.86%(2/70)vs 15.38%(10/65)](χ2=6.531,P=0.011).After intervention,scores of SAS and SDS in post-application group were lower than those in pre-application group(all P<0.05).After intervention,scores of quality of life in post-operative group were higher than those in pre-application group(all P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of evidence-based nursing intervention is good on patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis,which can effectively reduce occurrence of cardiovascular events,and improve their quality of life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.213.240