承包地“依法交回”条款的司法适用:规范表达与逻辑展开  

Judicial Application of the Contracted Land“Returning in Accordance with Law”Clause:Legislative Expression and Logical Reasoning

作　　者：江保国[1] JIANG Baoguo(College of Humanities and Law,South China Agricultural University,Guangzhou 510642,China)

机构地区：[1]华南农业大学人文与法学学院,广东广州510642

出　　处：《重庆三峡学院学报》2020年第6期25-33,共9页Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University

摘　　要：承包地“依法交回”条款16年的司法适用对当下建立承包权退出法律制度仍有诸多启示,其在规范表达和逻辑展开两个方面存在的诸多内在矛盾,在司法实践中造成了诸多困惑,彰显了各方主体在其中的不同立场和利益关切点,体现了政策与法律、逻辑与经验之间的双重张力关系。当下我国承包权退出机制的建构完善需要因应强制退出到自愿退出的转变,将自愿退出权利化、程序化。A systematic review of the sixteen year judicial application of the contracted land“returning in accordance with law”clause of the 2002 PRC Rural Contracted Land Act is still very rewarding,which indicates that the ambiguities and contradictions within this clause have resulted in many confusions in judicial practice.It reveals the divergent concerns of various stakeholders and the tensions between policy and law,logic and experience.The construction of the voluntary contracted land returning mechanism in China will depend on the adoption of a new approach toward rights and procedures.

关 键 词：承包地 依法交回 司法适用 

分 类 号：D922.32[政治法律—法学]