检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴龙龙[1] WU Longlong(School of Finance,Nanjing Audit University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211815,China)
出 处:《重庆三峡学院学报》2020年第6期43-54,共12页Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University
摘 要:中美经贸摩擦源于美国政府试图通过改变现行的国际收支格局和国内资本配置格局,解决其面临的社会矛盾的经济和政治目的。从本质上看,无论是现行的国际收支格局,还是美国国内的资本配置格局,或是美国面临的社会矛盾,都是资本能力诉求和资本意志表达的结果。现在两国虽已达成第一阶段贸易协议,但在遏制中国崛起的“初衷”不变的情况下,美国必然不断改变对中国实施经贸打压的手段。贸易战和技术战将成为中美经贸关系中的常态,金融战将是美国在经贸领域遏制中国崛起的主要手段。对此,中国应兼顾“治标”和“治本”的双重要求,从科学调控资本能力的诉求路径、优化资本意志的表达平台及理性表达自身的资本意志方面,采取相应的对策。The Sino-US economic and trade conflict stems from the economic and political purpose of the US government’s trying to solve the social contradictions by changing the current structure of international balance of payments and domestic capital allocation.In essence,not only the structure of international balance of payments and domestic capital allocation,but also the social contradictions that the United States faces are the outcome of capital capability pursuit and capital will expression.Although the two countries have agreed with each other on solving trade problem in the first stage,the United States will continue to innovate the means to suppress China in the realm of economy and trade under the condition that its original intention to prevent China from becoming strong remains unchanged.Therefore,both trade war and technology war will become the normal while financial war remains the major economic means for the United States to contain China’s rise.In this regard,China should give consideration to the dual requirements of both“temporary treatment”and“permanent cure”,and take countermeasures by means of regulating the path of capital capability pursuit scientifically,optimizing the expression platform of capital will and expressing its own capital rationally.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222