检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:岳园园[1] 史晓娇 柴秀红[1] YUE Yuan-yuan;SHI Xiao-jiao;CHAI Xiu-hong(No.7 Dept.of Genernal Surgery,Zhengzhou People's Hospial,Zhengzhou,Henan 450000)
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2020年第10期60-62,共3页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
摘 要:为探究强化自我效能干预对永久性肠造口患者自我效能及自护能力的影响,将永久性肠造口患者80例随机分为对照组和观察组,每组40例。对照组患者给予常规护理干预,观察组患者在此基础上给予强化自我效能干预,比较2组患者干预前、干预3个月后的自我效能[一般自我效能感量表(GSES)评分]及自护能力[自我护理能力量表(ESCA)评分]。结果显示,干预前,2组患者GSES评分、ESCA评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预3个月后,观察组患者GSES评分、ESCA各项评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结果表明,强化自我效能干预可优化永久性肠造口患者自我效能,提升自护能力,应用价值较高。This study was to investigate the influence of strengthening self-efficacy intervention(SEI)on self-care ability and self-efficacy of patients undergoing permanent stomy,randomly,divided 80 patients undergoing permanent stomy into control group(40 cases,routine nursing)and observation group(40 cases,routine nursing plus strengthening SEI;then,compared both groups’score on self-efficacy(using GSES table)and self-care ability(using ESCA table)before intervention and at 3 months after intervention.As results,before intervention in the ratings of GSES and ESCA there was no statistical difference between the two groups(P>0.05);at 3 months after intervention in both score ratings observation group was all higher than control group(P<0.05).Results show that strengthening SEI can optimize patients’self-efficacy,uplift their self-care ability,thus has higher application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15