大数据背景下域外信息隐私权的困境及应对——以个人信息控制为切入点  

The Dilemma and Countermeasures of the Right to Privacy of Foreign Information in the Context of Big Data——Taking Personal Information Control as the Entry Point

作　　者：鲁冰婉 Lu Bingwan(The School of Law,Jilin University,Changchun 130012)

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,长春130012

出　　处：《情报杂志》2020年第12期88-95,共8页Journal of Intelligence

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“我国死刑案件审理过程中民意的拟制与导入机制研究”(编号:13CFX060);吉林大学哲学社会科学青年学术骨干支持计划(编号:2016FRGG05)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：[目的/意义]大数据背景下以个人信息控制权为核心的传统信息隐私权正在面临失灵风险,欧盟及美国以本国隐私利益的价值选择为依托,在个人数据保护方面做出了不同回应。只有明确价值选择对个人数据保护路径的决定作用,才能更好的指导个人数据保护与安全。[方法/过程]明确个人信息控制权为信息隐私权的核心内涵,论证大数据背景下因同意原则失灵及匿名化处理的失败致域外信息隐私权遭受时代困境,剖析价值选择以致美欧困境解决产生不同回应,对我国个人数据保护路径提供指导。[结果/结论]疫情下可窥我国隐私利益的保护倾向为隐私是可让渡于国家利益及集体利益的一项公民权利。[Purpose/Significance]Under the background of big data,the traditional information privacy with the control right of personal information as the core is facing the risk of failure.The European Union and the United States have made different responses in terms of personal data protection based on the value choice of their own privacy interests.Only by making clear the decisive role of value selection on the path of personal data protection,can we better guide the protection and security of personal data.[Method/Process]Firstly,it makes clear that the right to control personal information is the core connotation of the right to information privacy.Secondly,it demonstrates that the failure of consent principle and the failure of anonymization in the context of big data lead to the dilemma of foreign information privacy,and analyzes the value choice,which leads to different responses to the dilemma of the United States and Europe,so as to provide guidance for the path of personal data protection in China.[Result/Conclusion]Under the COVID-19 pandemic,we can see that the protection tendency of privacy interests in China is that privacy is a civil right that can be transferred to national interests and collective interests.

关 键 词：大数据 个人信息保护 信息隐私权 价值选择 个人信息控制权 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]