误构的事实性——论维特根斯坦“语言游戏”不构成对利奥塔“误构”的支持  

Factuality of Misconstruction-An Analysis on Ludwig Wittgenstein’s“Language Game”Failing in Supporting Liotta’s“Misconstruction”

作　　者：王梦悦[1] WANG Meng-yue(Zhonghuan Informatiao College Tianjin University of Technology,Tianjin 300380,China)

机构地区：[1]天津理工大学中环信息学院,天津300380

出　　处：《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2020年第6期18-22,共5页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University

基　　金：天津市社科规划高校思想政治理论课专项课题“应用型大学思政课教学话语体系的建构研究”(TJSZZX17-031)。

摘　　要：文章意在完成这样一种论证:维特根斯坦意义上的“语言游戏”并不构成利奥塔在其《后现代状况》中所宣称的理论的支持。利奥塔所运用的“语言游戏”概念在其理论自身内构成其特有的意义,即一种话语的开放性基础,而作为最终目的的“误构”理论进一步与维特根斯坦的“语言游戏”理论在论证上本末倒置。利奥塔对宏大叙事的反对,实际上是对其与招数产生的“新思想”的不兼容性相关的,而真正对总体性构成反对的,实际上是效能叙事中“系统的恐怖”。加之其支持的开放系统的误构理论,维特根斯坦意义上的“语言游戏”在目的论和基质上都不构成支持和关联。对总体性的反对和对误构的支持在“语言游戏”的引证之外就已经获得其意义了。This paper aims to achieve such an argument:“Language Game”at the sense of Ludwig Wittgenstein does not constitute a supporting factor to theories claimed in Postmodern Condition written by Liotta.The concept of“Language Game”used by Liotta constitutes a special meaning in theory,which is an open foundation for discourse.The“misconstruction”theory for the ultimate purpose further has the order reversed compared with“Language Game”theory of Ludwig Wittgenstein in terms of their statements.Liotta’s objection to grand narration is actually related to the incompatibility with“new thoughts”produced by its tricks.What really objects to the totality is the“systematic horror”in efficiency narration.Besides,Ludwig Wittgenstein’s“Language Game”constitutes neither support nor association to the misconstruction theory of open systems supported by Liotta.The opposition to totality and the support for misconstruction have already acquired their meanings beyond the citation of“language game”.

关 键 词：误构 语言游戏 叙事 元规定 

分 类 号：B15[哲学宗教—世界哲学]