西方法哲学对微观和国家宏观主体认识的嬗变——从康德、黑格尔到马克思  

The Evolution of Cognition to the Micro and National Macro Subject in Western Philosophy:From Kant,Hegel to Marx

作　　者：李云峰 LI Yun-feng(School of Marxism,Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《湖南第一师范学院学报》2020年第5期1-7,共7页Journal of Hunan First Normal University

摘　　要：康德把哲学主体与法律上的主体联系起来,提出人格人是那些行为可以归责的主体,开启了从法哲学视角对微观和国家宏观主体理论概括的探索。黑格尔提出实体即主体,区分了市民社会与国家,提出人格权本质上是物权,深化了对微宏观主体——人的具体认识。马克思基于生产关系概念,把微观生产主体界定为生产力和生产关系的统一体或共同体,把国家宏观生产主体界定为经济基础和上层建筑的统一体或共同体,完成了从法哲学视角对微观和国家宏观生产主体——人的认识的理论概括,实现了对微观和国家宏观生产主体——人的概念认识的嬗变。Kant connected the philosophical subject with the legal subject,and proposed that the personality person is the subject that can be attributed to the behavior,which opened the exploration of the micro and national macro subject theory from the philosophical perspective.Hegel put forward that the entity is the subject,distinguishing the civil society from the state,and that the personality right is the real right in essence,which deepens the concrete understanding of the micro subject human.Based on the concept of production relations,Marx defined the micro production subject as the unity or community of productivity and production relations,and defined the national macro production subject as the unity or community of economic foundation and superstructure.He completed the theoretical summary of the understanding of the micro and national macro production subject human from the philosophical perspective,and realized the evolution of cognition to the micro and national macro production subject human.

关 键 词：法哲学 主体 微观主体 国家宏观生产主体 康德 黑格尔 马克思 

分 类 号：B0-0[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]