专利确权改革路径分析研究  

Analysis and Research on the Path of Patent Confirmation Reform

作　　者：刘梅 Liu Mei(School of Intellectual Property,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院,上海200042

出　　处：《中阿科技论坛（中英文）》2020年第11期175-178,共4页China-Arab States Science and Technology Forum

摘　　要：我国现行专利确权采行政确权单轨制模式,专利有效性仅由行政机关确定。因法院无权认定专利有效性,侵权诉讼中被诉侵权人往往会申请宣告涉案专利无效,形成行政与司法程序并存局面,导致专利侵权诉讼产生诉讼周期长、诉讼效率低下以及“循环诉讼”等弊端。对此,许多学者开始探索专利确权行政与司法“双轨制”模式。本文通过对我国专利确权及“双轨制”确权模式等文章进行梳理,展示现行研究在专利确权及“双轨制”问题上的研究成果,指出在先研究存在的不足,明晰进一步研究专利确权“双轨制”的目标与方向。China's current patent confirmation adopts the model of single-track administrative confirmation,that is,the validity of patents can only be determined by administrative agencies.Because the court does not have the right to determine the validity of patents,the infringed infringement litigants often apply to declare the invalid patents involved,resulting in a coexistence of administrative and judicial procedures,resulting in long litigation cycles,low litigation efficiency,and"circular litigation"And other disadvantages.In this regard,many scholars have begun to explore the choice of the"dual-track system"of patent confirmation administration and judicial administration.This article combs through the articles on patent confirmation and the“dual-track system”in China,shows the research results on the“dual-track system”of patent confirmation,points out the deficiencies in the previous research,and clarifies the further research on patent confirmation The goal and direction of the"dual track system".

关 键 词：专利确权 行政确权 司法确权 专利无效 双轨制 

分 类 号：DF525.2[政治法律—民商法学]