检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:薛锋[1,2] 黄倩 李书 路红卫 张厚红 XUE Feng;HUANG Qian;LI Shu;LU Hong-wei;ZHANG Hou-hong(School of Transportation and Logistics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 611756,China;National Engineering Laboratory of Integrated Transportation Big Data Application Technology,Chengdu 611756,China;Freight Department,China Railway Taiyuan Group Co.,Ltd.,Taiyuan 030013,China;Institute of Science and Technology,Daqin Railway Co.,Ltd.,Taiyuan 030013,China;Nanjing Institute of Railway Technology,Nanjing 210031,China)
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学,交通运输与物流学院,成都611756 [2]综合交通大数据应用技术国家工程实验室,成都611756 [3]中国铁路太原局集团有限公司,货运部,太原030013 [4]大秦铁路股份有限公司,科学技术研究所,太原030013 [5]南京铁道职业技术学院,南京210031
出 处:《交通运输工程与信息学报》2020年第4期103-109,共7页Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information
基 金:中国国家铁路集团有限公司科技研究开发计划重大项目(P2018X003);四川省科技计划项目(2019YJ0211);西南交通大学“一带一路”研究专项任务项目(268YDYLY01);中国铁路太原局集团有限公司科技研究开发计划项目(A2019Y07)
摘 要:对中欧班列开行方案进行合理评价,有助于开行方案的调整及优化。选取15个具有代表性的评价指标,建立评价指标体系,采用C2R模型、锥比率模型、交叉效率以及熵权法等方法有机结合,对DEA评价模型进行改进,以提高其评价效果及可靠度,使评价过程不依赖主观结果,能够有效解决多投入多输出的评价问题。运用改进的DEA模型对中欧班列开行方案进行评价,结果表明:对选取的5个中欧班列开行方案进行有效性评价并排序,其中有4个是有效的,即目前的开行方案是可行的;有1个方案是无效的,即需要对方案进行改正。通过实例分析证明了该方法的实用性,可为中欧班列开行方案的评价过程及结果的制定及优化提供依据和参考。A reasonable evaluation of the transportation plan of China Railway(CR)Express will help to adjust and optimize its train operation plan.Fifteen representative evaluation indicators were selected to establish an evaluation index system.The C2R model,cone ratio model,crossover efficiency,and organic combination of the entropy weight method were applied to improve the data envelopment analysis(DEA)evaluation model and its evaluation effect and reliability.The evaluation process did not depend on subjective results and could be used to solve the problem of multi-input and multi-output evaluation effectively.The improved DEA model was used to evaluate the transportation plan of CR Express,and the results showed that the selected five transportation plans of the CR Express were ranked,out of which four were valid.In other words,the current scheme was feasible;there was one when the plan was invalid,which required correction.The evaluation process and results of the CR Express transportation plan can provide a basis and reference for its formulation and optimization.
分 类 号:U292[交通运输工程—交通运输规划与管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42