检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈栋 SHEN Dong(Rail Transportation Engineering Co.,Ltd.of China Railway 19th Bureau Group Co.,Ltd,Beijing 101399,China)
机构地区:[1]中铁十九局集团轨道交通工程有限公司,北京101399
出 处:《建筑经济》2020年第12期31-35,共5页Construction Economy
基 金:中铁十九局集团有限公司科技发展计划项目(13-18B)。
摘 要:通过对既有情势变更的审判案例及法院最终审判意见进行分析,找出现行情势变更原则在建设合同纠纷判定中的限制与不足,并对《合同编》中引入的再交涉制度在建设合同发生纠纷时发挥的效率价值进行分析。最终得出结论:在建设工程施工合同的履行中,引入再交涉制度对情势变更纠纷进行处理,能够有效缓解法官基于个人对法律认知不同导致法律适用时的不确定性,对保护建设合同双方意思自治、实现法的效率价值、促进合同顺畅进行具有现实意义。The paper finds out the limitation and deficiency of the current principle of change of circumstances in dispute determination by the analysis of the trial cases of the change of circumstances and the final judgment of the court,in addition,makes analysis of the efficiency value of the renegotiation system introduced in the“Contractual Arrangements”when it occurs disputes for construction contract.Finally,During the implementation of construction project contract,it is possible to alleviate judge’s uncertainty when applying the law based on different personal legal cognition,if the renegotiation system is introduced to deal with disputes related to changed circumstances.This is of great significance to protect autonomy of both parties’will in construction project contract,realize the efficiency value of law,and smooth the contract implementation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7