重构演绎主义及其不当应用  

Reconstructive Deductivism and Its Misapplication

作　　者：谢婷 Ting Xie(Department of Philosophy,East China Normal University)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学哲学系

出　　处：《逻辑学研究》2020年第6期111-130,共20页Studies in Logic

摘　　要：本文基于运行机制的差异将重构演绎主义区分为限制的重构演绎主义(QRD)与非限制的重构演绎主义(NQRD)。文章批判性考察和分析了QRD与NQRD各自所面临的理论困境与自我辩护,并揭示了两者在重构非演绎论证过程中的不足。基于此,本文主张重构演绎主义无法为自然语言论证的分析与评估提供充分的理论工具。This paper differentiates two types of reconstructive deductivism:qualified reconstructive deductivism(QRD)and nonqualified reconstructive deductivism(NQRD)in terms of distinctions in their working methods.With a critical survey on the objections against and justifications for them,I shall argue that some objections against reconstructive deductivism are untenable and some justifications are problematic in themselves.I also argue that neither QRD nor NQRD is an adequate theory for natural language arguments,though they do trigger a number of theoretical issues.

关 键 词：演绎主义 演绎论证 自然语言 理论困境 自我辩护 运行机制 NQR 不当应用 

分 类 号：B812.23[哲学宗教—逻辑学]