检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚彩英 李大连 杨娟珍 Yao Caiying;Li Dalian;Yang Juanzhen(The First Department of Psychiatry,Public Health Hospital of Yangjiang City,Guangdong Province,Guangdong Yangjiang 529500)
机构地区:[1]广东省阳江市公共卫生医院精神一科,广东阳江529500
出 处:《中国社区医师》2020年第35期162-163,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探讨互助管理模式对流浪精神发育迟滞患者康复效果的影响。方法:选取住院精神发育迟滞患者42例,分观察组和对照组,各21例。两组患者均接受精神科药物治疗和常规护理;观察组进行为期3个月的互助管理和生活技能训练。比较两组干预效果。结果:观察组干预后日常生活能力(ADL)评分、社会功能缺陷(SDSS)评分均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);观察组社会功能、社会兴趣及个人整洁评分均高于对照组,激惹、精神病表现、迟缓及抑郁评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:互助管理有助于提高流浪精神发育迟滞患者的日常生活能力和自我照顾能力。Objective:To explore the influence of mutual aid management mode on the rehabilitation effect of vagrant mental retardation patients.Methods:42 hospitalized patients with mental retardation were selected and they were divided into observation group and control group with 21 cases in each group.Both groups received psychiatric drug therapy and conventional nursing.The observation group was trained in mutual aid management and life skills for three months.The effects of intervention were compared between the two groups.Results:The daily life ability(ADL)score and social functional impairment(SDSS)score of the observation group after intervention were better than the control group,with the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The scores of social function,social interest and personal tidiness in the observation group were all higher than the control group,while the scores of irritability,psychosis performance,slowness and depression were all lower than the control group,with the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Mutual aid management is helpful to improve the daily life ability and self-care ability of vagrancy mental retardation patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3