检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王秀萍 WANG Xiu-ping(Ningxia Vocational College of Police Officers,Yinchuan,Ningxia 750021,China)
出 处:《教育教学论坛》2020年第53期141-143,共3页Education And Teaching Forum
基 金:2018年度宁夏回族自治区高等学校科学技术研究项目“宁夏地区治安案件调解的风险及应对策略研究”(NGY2018-219)。
摘 要:治安调解制度相对于人民调解、司法调解而言,其在避免轻微违法案件中违法行为人被治安处罚、维护社会治安秩序稳定、化解社会矛盾等方面具有显著优势。然而由于治安调解协议不具有强制执行力,部分当事人不履行调解协议较为随意,造成行政和司法资源的严重浪费。该文基于提高治安调解的社会功能考量,对明确治安调解协议的法律效力进行可行性探析和建议。Compared with the People's mediation and judicial mediation,the public security mediation has obvious advantages in avoiding the penalty of public security,maintaining the stability of public security order and resolving the social contradictions.However,because the public security mediation agreement does not have the force of enforcement,and some parties do not carry out the mediation agreement at will,resulting in a serious waste of administrative and judicial resources.Based on the consideration of improving the social function of public security mediation,this paper makes a feasibility analysis and puts forward some suggestions on clarifying the legal effect of public security mediation agreement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15