公正与效率:国际商事仲裁调解中立人制度的价值博弈及中国因应  

Justice and Efficiency:The Value Game of Mediation Neutral System in International Commercial Arbitration and China's Response

作　　者：孙志煜[1] 郑钧洋 SUN Zhi-yu;ZHENG Jun-yang(Law School of Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China)

机构地区：[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《时代法学》2020年第6期89-95,共7页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：贵州省哲学社会科学规划一般课题“中国区域贸易争端解决的理论建构与实践应对研究”(批准号:16GZYB03);贵州大学文科重点学科及特色学科重大科研项目“民商事纠纷解决的国内法与国际法互动研究”(批准号:GDZT201601)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：国际商事仲裁调解中立人制度的规则设计与仲裁基本价值中效率与公平的取向争论直接相关,仲裁机构若要扩大其在全球仲裁市场的版图,公正应是首要价值追求。采取相同中立人制度为原则使得仲裁机构不仅受到英美法系国家用户的质疑,而且会使其裁决不被外国法院执行,反有损纠纷解决效率。我国仲裁机构亟待变革固守的相同中立人制度,借鉴新加坡国际商事纠纷解决制度,以非相同中立人制度为原则规定,并从构建仲调流畅衔接机制新角度提高纠纷解决效率,保障程序公正。The neutral system of international commercial arbitration is directly related to the dispute of efficiency and fairness.Fairness should be the primary value pursuit for arbitration institutions to expand their presence in the global arbitration market.Adopting the same neutral mode as the principle will not only make the arbitration institution be challenged by the users in the common law countries,but also make the award not be enforced by the foreign court,which will damage the efficiency of the dispute settlement.In order to improve the efficiency and guarantee the justice of the procedure,the arbitration institutions in China need to change the system of the same neutral,which should be based on the Singapore experience.

关 键 词：仲裁调解 中立人 程序公正 

分 类 号：DF973[政治法律—国际法学]