检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张屹 ZHANG Yi(Institute of Asia-pacific Studies,China Academy of International Studies,Beijing 100875,China)
机构地区:[1]中国国际问题研究院亚太研究所,北京100875
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2020年第6期11-15,共5页Journal of Henan Police College
摘 要:当今时代,全球治理使公共安全功能溢出为国家安全乃至国际安全,即安全议题打破了边界。非传统安全打通国家安全与公共安全体系的互斥性,融合了两个概念的外延,使得公共领域和国家领域无论从经济层面还是安全层面都相互转换,在错位中形成治理困局。公共安全与国家安全的概念划分具有一定伪命题属性,学理上的讨论是概念划分的积极方面,然而一些西方国家的政党私利却将概念划分引向消极方向。Nowadays,global governance makes the spillover of public security function into national security and even international security,that is,security issues break the boundary.Non traditional security opens up the mutual exclusion of national security and public security system,and integrates the extension of the two concepts,which makes the public domain and the national domain transform each other from the economic level or the security level,forming Governance Dilemma in the dislocation.The concept division of public security and national security has a certain pseudo proposition attribute,and the theoretical discussion is the positive aspect of concept division.However,some western countries'political parties'private interests are likely to use the concept division in a negative direction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.89.16