检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张琦 ZHANG Qi(Henan High People's Court,Henan 450002,China)
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2020年第6期87-93,共7页Journal of Henan Police College
摘 要:醉驾型危险驾驶案件数量不断增多,已经超越盗窃成为总数最多的案件。少数地方出台规范性文件,以规定不起诉条件等方式变相提高入罪标准,减少进入审判环节的案件,期望人为降低醉驾案件数量。然而,减少案件数量并非遏制醉驾犯罪的根本途径。通过对某省2018年24881个生效醉驾案件的调研和对裁判文书的实证分析,不难看出,只有以优化法定刑设置为基础,才能为醉驾犯罪的立法和司法提供较为有效的方法和途径。With the increasing number of the risky driving cases of drunk driving,it has,surpassing theft,become the first major crime.A few places have issued normative documents to raise the conviction standard in disguise by stipulating the conditions for non-prosecution,reducing the number of cases entering the trial stage,and expecting to artificially reduce the number of drunk driving cases.However,reducing the number of cases is not the fundamental way to curb drunk driving crimes.Through the investigation of 24881 effective drunk driving cases in a province in 2018 and the empirical analysis of judgment documents,it is not difficult to see that only on the basis of optimizing the statutory penalty setting can we provide more effective methods and channels for the legislation and justice of drunk driving crimes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229