检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄亮[1] 李远平[1] 张英毅[1] 赵雪云[1] 邓苗 Huang Liang;Li Yuanping;Zhang Yingyi;Zhao Xueyun;Deng Miao(Leshan People's Hospital,Nail Surgery,Leshan,Sichuan 614000,China)
机构地区:[1]乐山市人民医院甲乳外科,四川乐山614000
出 处:《医药前沿》2020年第26期30-31,共2页Journal of Frontiers of Medicine
摘 要:目的:探究超声引导下经皮穿刺微波消融术对甲状腺良性结节的效果和安全性。方法:选取2018年2月-2020年2月入院就诊的30例甲状腺良性结节患者,应用双色球法随机将患者平均分为两组。接受超声引导下经皮穿刺微波消融术治疗的为实验组;接受常规切除手术治疗的为对照组,比较不同治疗方法的临床效果。结果:实验组患者临床治疗总有效率100.00%,对照组临床治疗总有效率为73.33%,组间对比具有统计学差异(χ^2=4.6154,P=0.0316)。结论:较常规外科切除手术治疗,超声引导下经皮穿刺微波消融术治疗在甲状腺良性结节患者中具有效果好,安全性高的优势,值得应用。Objective To explore the effect and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for benign thyroid nodules.Methods The starting and ending time of this study were February 2018 and February 2020 respectively.A total of 30 patients with thyroid benign nodule who were hospitalized in the study period were included in the study.According to the dichroism method,the patients were divided into two groups.One group received ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation,and was divided into experimental group,the other group received conventional resection and control group Group B,compare the clinical effect of different treatment methods.Results The total effective rate of clinical treatment was 100.00%in the experimental group and 73.33%in the control group,with statistically significant difference(χ^2=4.6154,P=0.0316).Conclusion Compared with the traditional surgical resection,ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation has the advantages of good effect and high safety in patients with benign thyroid nodules,worthy of application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.19.6