检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓春梅[1] DENG Chunmei(Faculty of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan Hunan411105,China)
出 处:《长沙大学学报》2020年第6期13-18,共6页Journal of Changsha University
基 金:湖南省社科基金项目“医疗纠纷调解合意概念及其形成模式研究”,编号:18JD68;湖南省教育厅重点项目“医疗纠纷调解合意保障机制研究”,编号:18A075。
摘 要:探明矛盾产生的深层根源,是推进制度变革、妥善解决纠纷的重要前提。医疗纠纷问题,是新世纪中国社会遭遇的一个棘手问题,也是现代各国的共同难题之一。医疗纠纷的泛滥,直接源于学界强调的医院内部管理不科学、医卫制度不完善、医疗纠纷解决机制存在缺陷等直观原因,但其深层根源却主要在于现代社会医病关系的陌生人化、科学理性与常识理性的隔膜化、医疗服务市场中的资本逐利本性,以及“法不懂医”的医疗纠纷解决困境。因此,现代医疗纠纷的根本解决,亟需从顶层设计出发,构建系统协作的科学治理模式与具体规制体系。To explore the deep-rooted causes of contradictions is an important prerequisite for promoting institutional changes and properly resolving disputes.The issue of medical disputes is a thorny issue not only for China but also for almost every modern country.The spread of medical disputes is due to the intuitive reasons that the hospital administration is not scientific,the medical system is imperfect,and the medical dispute resolutions is flawed.However,its deep roots stem from the strangerization of doctor-patient relations in modern society,the separation of scientific rationality and common sense,the failure of medical market regulation,and the dilemma of“judges can not understand medicals”.Therefore,its fundamental solution calls for the construction of scientific structure and specific regulations under a correct top-level design.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.235.161