清代山陕滩案中的征租问题研究  

Research on Rent Collection Disputes over Alluvium between Shanxi and Shaanxi Province in Qing Dynasty

作　　者：胡英泽[1] HU Yingze(Research Center for Chinese Social History,Shanxi University)

机构地区：[1]山西大学中国社会史研究中心,太原030006

出　　处：《清史研究》2020年第6期85-97,共13页The Qing History Journal

摘　　要：龙门至潼关段是典型的游荡性河道,河道变迁经常引发两省的滩地之争。清宫档案记载了山陕两省及朝廷调解、裁判的具体过程,反映了河道演变对山陕两省以及朝廷划分边界的影响。出于保护河道等原因,朝廷清晰界定了滩地所有权,把滩地定为官田,划拨给沿河村庄后征收租谷,并非"关中模式"所说的租、赋混淆,产权观念模糊。"关中模式"强调超经济强制、权势,清宫档案显示了不同于权势的国家权力,不同于人身依附的环境依附。The section of the Yellow River from Longmen to Tongguan has a typical wandering course.The changes of the river’s course often led to disputes over the alluvial deposits on both sides of the border.The archives of the Qing Court reveal the central government’s role in the mediation of disputes between Shanxi and Shaanxi provinces when changes in course of the river affected the boundary between the two provinces.For reasons such as river protection,the central government clearly defined the ownership of alluvium and designated it as official land.The government allocated the land to related villages and imposed rent and tax obligations.This was not the so-called Guanzhong Mode of confused rent and tax collection or the fuzzy concept of property rights.The Guanzhong Mode emphasized extra-economic coercion and force.Archives of the Qing Court clearly reveal that state power was different from coercion,and environmental dependence was different from personal attachment.

关 键 词：清代 山陕 黄河滩地 租 关中模式 

分 类 号：K249[历史地理—历史学]