检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦凤霞 QIN Fengxia(No.3 Department of Cardiology,Chaoyang Central Hospital,Chaoyang 122000,China)
机构地区:[1]朝阳市中心医院心内三科,辽宁朝阳122000
出 处:《中国医药指南》2020年第32期159-160,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨给予不稳定型心绞痛患者优质护理干预的临床效果。方法选取医院2017年6月至2018年5月诊治的不稳定型心绞痛患者中的104例为研究对象,根据护理模式不同,将采取常规护理干预者设为对照组(n=52),将采取优质护理干预者设为研究组(n=52),比较两组患者的不稳定型心绞痛整体疗效、主观护理体验差异。结果①研究组患者的不稳定型心绞痛整体治疗有效率(96.15%)高于对照组(84.62%)(χ^2=3.983,P=0.046);②研究组患者主观护理体验优良率(100.00%)高于对照组(86.54%)(χ^2=5.514,P=0.019)。结论给予不稳定型心绞痛患者优质护理干预的临床效果确切,不但能辅助治疗,还可改善患者主观护理体验。Objective To explore the clinical effect of quality nursing intervention for patients with unstable angina pectoris.Methods A total of 104 patients with unstable angina pectoris diagnosed and treated in the hospital from June 2017 to May 2018 were selected as the research objects.According to the diff erent nursing models,the conventional nursing interventions were set as the control group(n=52),and high-quality nursing interventionists were set as the study group(n=52),and the overall effi cacy and subjective nursing experience diff erences of patients with unstable angina were compared between the two groups.Result(1)The overall eff ective rate of unstable angina pectoris in the study group(96.15%)was higher than that in the control group(84.62%)(χ^2=3.983,P=0.046);(2)the excellent rate of subjective nursing experience in the study group(100.00%)was higher than that in the control group(86.54%)(χ^2=5.514,P=0.019).Conclusion The clinical eff ect of high quality nursing intervention for patients with unstable angina pectoris is exact.It can not only assist the treatment,but also improve the subjective nursing experience of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104