超越属地主义:已撤销仲裁裁决的承认与执行  

Beyond Territorial Theory:Recognition and Enforcem ent of Vacated Arbitral Award

作　　者：桑远棵 SANG Yuanke

机构地区：[1]武汉大学国际法研究所

出　　处：《武大国际法评论》2020年第4期75-93,共19页Wuhan University International Law Review

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究课题“一带一路倡议与法律合作研究”(项目批准号:16JJD820009)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：已撤销仲裁裁决的承认与执行问题是1958年《纽约公约》在适用过程中最具代表性的争议事项,缔约国在此问题上形成了纷繁多样的做法,对多边条约体系所要求的一致性、确定性、可预见性构成严重减损。事实上,已撤销仲裁裁决的承认与执行问题的产生主要有两大原因:直接原因是《纽约公约》仅调整仲裁裁决的承认与执行事项,而仲裁裁决的撤销事项则留由缔约国根据其国内法进行裁断;根本原因是各缔约国的国际商事仲裁基于不同的理论基础。通过分析《纽约公约》的制定背景和内在目标,解决现有问题的根本立场是采纳相对属地主义理论,即在认可执行地对是否承认与执行已撤销仲裁裁决具有裁量权的基础上,进一步规范执行地的裁量权并设定相应的例外规定。The recognition and enforcement of vacated arbitral award is the most representative controversial issue in the application process of 1958 New York Convention,contracting states have formed diverse attitudes towards this issue,leading to the serious derogation of the consistency,certainty and predictability required by the multilateral treaty system.In fact,there are main-ly two reasons behind the occurrence of recognition and enforcement of vacat-ed arbitral award,The direct reason is that New York Convention merely regu-lates the matter of recognition and enforcement of arbitral award,and leaves the contracting states to set aside the arbitral award under their domestic law;The fundamental reason is that contracting states have adopted different theoreti-cal bases for international commercial arbitration.Through analyzing the enact-ing background and inner goal of New York Convention,the fundamental posi-tion to approach current problem is to adopt comparative territorial theory,which is based on the acceptance that enforcing state has discretion to adjudi-cate whether to recognize and enforce the vacated arbitral award or not,and.further regulate the enforcing state’s discretion by setting corresponding excep-tion rules.

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁 已撤销仲裁裁决 判决的承认与执行 纽约公约 日内瓦公约 属地主义理论 非当地化理论 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]