论责任重合下知识产权民刑交叉案件的处理顺序  

Order of Processing with the Cross Cases Between Criminal Law and Civil Law Under Overlapping Responsibilities of Intellectual Property Rights

作　　者：知识产权诉讼特别程序研究课题组 Research Group on Special Procedures of Intellectual Property Litigation

机构地区：[1]不详

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2020年第6期60-77,共18页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

基　　金：最高人民法院2018年度司法研究重大课题“知识产权诉讼特别程序研究”的结项研究成果。

摘　　要：基于知识产权案件民事责任和刑事责任的重合,会涉及知识产权民刑交叉案件的处理顺序问题,不同法院处理方式以及不同案件的处理和理由各不相同,做法不一。本文立足知识产权民刑交叉案件的特性,以重构程序设计为基点,明确中止程序所依据的边界,提出依事实认定方式划分法域边界,依利益衡量界定中止程序。Due to the particularity of intellectual property cases,it is easy to bring about the overlapping of civil and criminal liabilities.Under the overlapping of responsibilities,the issue of the processing order of intellectual property criminal and civil cases has arisen.From the perspective of practice,different courts have different handling methods,and different cases have different reasons.The main problems are the wide range of courts involved,the different constitution of collegiate panels,and the different ways of the courts as to whether they meet the conditions for prosecution and whether to suspend the litigation.This paper proposes to reconstruct the procedure design.It is not recommended to include intellectual property cases in the scope of criminal incidental civil litigation,and it is recommended to deepen the reform of the"three trials in one"and divide the boundary of legal facts by means of fact determination,and define the suspension procedure based on value judgments.

关 键 词：知识产权 民刑交叉 处理顺序 法律事实 中止诉讼 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]