检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈晓 Chen Xiao
机构地区:[1]济南海关办公室
出 处:《海关与经贸研究》2020年第6期76-86,共11页Journal of Customs and Trade
摘 要:在监管执法一线(主要在进境环节),邮局海关如何划分界定邮递"物"的"货物""物品"属性,是老大难问题。后续衍生的限值认定、税款征收、行政处罚和知识产权海关保护等相关监管执法热点也存在类似疑难。本文通过梳理背后立法和执法逻辑,明确法律适用理解,提出或坚持立法原义或弃用"货物""物品"二分法,便利和统一监管执法的解决路径,希望对海关法律体系中根基性"物"的海关立法工作有所裨益。It is a tricky problem for customs and post offices on the frontline to determine the status of"goods"or"articles"in postal consignment,particularly in the link of importation.As a consequence,there are also many similar problems derived from that,including determination of threshold value,duty collection,administrative penalty,IPR protection and other hot issues in customs enforcement.Through combing through the legislative and enforcement rationale behind and specifying the application of relevant regulations,the paper proposes the solution of adhering to the original legislative intent or abandon the differentiation of"goods"and"articles",so as to facilitate and unify customs enforcement and provides some insights on customs legislation on the fundamental"things"in the customs legal system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28