检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵泽睿 Zhao Zerui
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学法学院 [2]中国法与社会研究院暨人工智能研究院人工智能治理与法律研究中心
出 处:《电子知识产权》2020年第12期34-48,共15页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:互联网平台的出现一方面极大地促进了内容创新,但另一方面也引发了大量的侵犯著作权的问题。美国国会出于消除传统版权责任给互联网平台发展与自治带来的制度阻碍的目的,于1998年发布了《数字千年版权法》,设立了至今影响全球的避风港原则。然而,随着美国互联网平台规模的急速扩张,美国法院为了督促平台使用其强大的管理权力保护版权,不断对避风港原则进行限缩。基于此,我们在借鉴美国的制度经验时应当结合互联网平台的动态发展,在认可我国较为严苛的避风港规则的同时,将原创性标准引入红旗规则,以此在督促互联网平台进行侵权内容审查时,激励用户进行内容创新。The rise of internet platform greatly promotes the content innovation,at the same time,it also caused a lot of copyright infringement problems.In order to remove the institutional obstacles brought by traditional copyright liability to the development and autonomy of Internet platforms,the US Congress issued the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in 1998,establishing the principles of safe harbor that have influenced the whole world.However,with the rapid expansion of the scale of the internet platform in the United States,in order to urge the platform to use its powerful management power to protect copyright,the Court of the United States has continuously restricted the principle of safe harbor.Therefore,we should learn from the institutional experience of the United States in combination with the dynamic development of the internet platform,recognize China's relatively strict rules of safe harbor,and introduce the original standard into the red flag rule,so as to encourage users to carry out content innovation when urging the internet platform to carry out the censorship of infringing content.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44