检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李建东 Li Jiandong
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120 [2]河南警察学院,河南郑州450046
出 处:《河南社会科学》2020年第12期54-62,共9页Henan Social Sciences
基 金:西南政法大学大学生科研创新项目“认罪认罚案件被害人权利保障问题研究”(2018XZXS-015);河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“审判中心改革视域下侦查模式转型研究”(2017BFX011)。
摘 要:认罪认罚从宽制度效率和政策的二元功能定位与被害人权利保障兼有冲突与契合,“效率优先,保障公正”的价值取向使被害人权利保障的制度空间较为有限。实践表明,间接参与量刑程序的依附模式使被害人权利保障具有流于形式的倾向,司法机关缺乏保障被害人权利的动力。赋予被害人独立的量刑参与权限,实现从依附模式向独立参与模式转变是被害人权利保障问题的出路所在,赋予被害人独立建议权具有相应的法理依据。在现行法律框架体系之内,根据适用和解程序与否,认罪认罚从宽案件可以分别赋予被害人基准刑20%和10%的独立量刑参与权限幅度。被害人独立量刑建议的菜单选择模式能够保障诉讼效率不受减损,同时可以使不具有法律专业知识的普通被害人也能实现其自主意志。为完善权利保障机制,应当同时设立被害人独立参与量刑程序的权利救济制度。The dual function positioning of the system efficiency and policy and the victim’s rights protection have conflicts and conformation.The value orientation of“efficiency first,safeguarding justice”makes the victim’s rights protection system space more limited.The practice shows that the attachment mode of indirectly participating in the sentencing procedure makes the victim’s rights protection have a tendency of mere formality,and the judicial organs lack the power to protect the victim’s rights.The way out for the protection of the victim’s rights lies in giving the victim the independent right to participate in sentencing and changing from the dependent mode to the independent participation mode,and giving the victim the right of independent suggestion has the corresponding legal philosophy basis.Within the current legal framework,according to whether the conciliation procedure is applied or not,the victim can be given 20%and 10%of the standard penalty to participate in independent sentencing respectively.The menu selection mode suggested by the victim independent sentencing can ensure that the litigation efficiency will not be impaired,and at the same time,ordinary victims who do not have legal professional knowledge can also effectively realize their independent will.As a perfect right protection mechanism,the right relief system for victims to independently participate in the sentencing procedure should be established at the same time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.238.86