智慧法院建设对接近正义的双刃剑效应与规制路径  

The Double-edged Sword Effect and Regulation Path of Smart Justice on Access to Justice

作　　者：孟醒 MENG Xing(Law School of Liaoning University)

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2020年第6期33-44,206,共13页Journal Of CUPL

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目“新试点改革下的民事繁简分流研究”(项目编号:20CFX031)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：接近正义理论追求司法亲民化建设,为全球化司法改革的主要指导,也是我国"司法为民"的内在含义。智慧法院因其技术优势而对接近正义改革具有举足轻重的推动作用,也因其技术特性而具有阻碍司法亲民化建设的潜在风险。我国当前的智慧法院建设对接近正义方面的双刃剑效应关注不够,应加以重视,谨慎推进智慧法院在便民化、公开化、资源分配精准化方面的积极效果,注重智能技术对传统程序理论的解构重组,减小智能技术因数字鸿沟和心智带宽而引起的司法不平等,从宏观的政策性响应下沉至具体的需求性建设。Access to justice pursues a closer distance between the court and the citizen.It is a theory that guides the global judicial reform,and is also an inherent meaning of"judicial for people"in China.Because of its technical advantages,smart justice plays an important role in promoting access to justice reform.On the other hand,it also has a potential risk of hindering the construction of judicial closeness to people.The current construction of smart justice in China does not pay enough attention to the double-edged sword effect towards access to justice,which should be changed.We should prudently promote the positive effects of smart justice in terms of convenience,openness,and precise resource allocation,and reduce judicial inequality caused by digital divide and mental bandwidth.The smart justice construction should sink from macro-policy response to specific demand construction.

关 键 词：智慧法院 接近正义 司法为民 程序内核 司法平等 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]