“有偿请托”的私法定性及其司法规制  

Characterization of“Paid Request and Entrustment”in Private Law and Its Judicial Regulation

作　　者：陈广辉[1,2] CHEN Guanghui(Doctorate candidate of law,School of Civil and Commercial Law,China University of Political Science and Law)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学 [2]北京市第二中级人民法院

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2020年第6期162-173,F0003,共13页Journal Of CUPL

摘　　要：有偿请托类案件是司法实践中经常出现的一类纠纷,但在案由、效力判断和费用返还方面各法院裁判标准并不一致。本文认为应当以委托合同统一规范请托行为的法律关系,在此基础上根据《民法典》总则编的相关规则判定其效力。违反法律、行政法规的效力性强制性规定的请托行为无效,在此过程中效力性强制性规定的识别是法官的首要任务。对于公序良俗的适用,应当赋予法官自主裁量权。对于无效的请托行为,不应适用不法原因给付不得返还的原则予以处理,而应确立返还请托费用本金、不支持利息等损害赔偿的做法,实现对请托双方行为不法性的否定性评价。"Paid request and entrustment"is a type of dispute that often arises in judicial practice,while the adjudication criteria for cause of action,the judgement of validity and refund vary from court to court.In this article,it proposes to regulate the legal relationship of the practice of request and entrustment by commission agreement,based on which its validity should be determined according to the relevant rules of the General Provision of the Civil Code.A request is null and void if it violates the imperative provisions of any law or administrative regulation on validity,the identification of which is the primary task of the judge.Meanwhile,the judge shall have discretion to apply the rule of"public order and good morals".As for invalid requests,the practice of"return of the principal of the request fee and no compensation for damages such as interest"shall be established instead of"no return for payment of unlawful cause",so as to achieve a negative assessment of the unlawfulness of both parties’practices.

关 键 词：有偿请托 不法给付 不当得利 公序良俗 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]