检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐玉君 蒋斌 杨锋 肖霞 黄和金 张建飞 TANG Yujun;JIANG Bin;YANG Feng;XIAO Xia;HUANG Hejin;ZHANG Jianfei(Nanhua University Second Affiliated Hospital,Hengyang Hunan 421000,China)
机构地区:[1]南华大学附属第二医院烧伤整形科,湖南衡阳421000
出 处:《临床研究》2021年第1期8-10,共3页Clinical Research
基 金:湖南省卫生健康委员会项目(B20180058)。
摘 要:目的评价动力辅助旋切刀治疗男性乳房肥大症(GM)的疗效及安全性。方法收集2005年至2018年本院125例男性乳房肥大患者的临床资料按手术方法分为旋切刀组71例和吸脂组54例。比较两组手术时间、术后并发症、复发情况、患者满意度。结果与吸脂组相比,旋切刀组手术时间短、复发率低、术后满意度高,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);两组并发疤痕增生,血肿,可逆性乳头感觉减退,皮肤擦伤发生率无统计学差异(P> 0.05),两组均未发生感染以及乳头畸形(P> 0.05)。结论动力辅助旋切刀微创,手术时间短,并发症少,切除腺体可靠,复发率低,患者满意度高,推荐作为Simon's Ⅰ~Ⅱ型男性乳房肥大患者首选的手术方式。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of power-assisted rotary Cutter in the treatment of male breast hypertrophy(GM).Methods From 2005 to 2018,the clinical data of 125 male patients with breast hypertrophy in our hospital were collected,according to the operative methods,71 cases were divided into the rotary cutter group and 54 cases into the liposuction group.The operation time,postoperative complications,recurrence and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with the liposuction group,the operation time was shorter,the recurrence rate was lower and the postoperative satisfaction was higher in the rotary knife group(P<0.05),there was no significant difference in the incidence of skin abrasion(P>0.05).There was no infection and nipple deformity between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Power-assisted rotary cutter has the advantages of minimal invasion,short operation time,less complications,reliable gland resection,low recurrence rate and high patient satisfaction.It is recommended to be the first choice for Simon's I~II type male patients with breast hypertrophy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.124.142