检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴晓彤
机构地区:[1]香港大学法律学院
出 处:《中国民商》2020年第12期237-238,241,共3页China Civil Entrepreneur
摘 要:近年来,随着区块链存证技术在我国在线仲裁领域实践的不断推进,在在线仲裁中为当事人提供区块链存证服务的行业已初具规模。但各平台运营主体数量的不断增长客观上造成市面上存证服务和产品鱼龙混杂的现象,同时针对该新兴技术在仲裁领域内的应用也缺乏配套性规定予以指导。此外,除却上述仲裁实践中显现的表层问题,区块链存证技术自身亦潜伏着容量超负荷风险与“去中心化”的自我矛盾等深层次问题。因此,笔者以我国主流仲裁机构及第三方商业主体对区块链存证技术的应用实践为研究对象,通过对现存问题的自我审视与对潜在风险的深度挖掘,探索我国在线仲裁中区块链存证技术应用的完善进路。In these years,with the development of blockchain technology in the field of online arbitration in China,the industry of the storage of digital evidence with blockchain technology for parties in online arbitration has begun to take shape.However,the growth of the number of platforms results in the mixture of good and bad products existing in the market.At the same time,the application of this emerging technology in arbitration field is also lack of regulation and direction.In addition,there are also deepseated problems such as the risk of capacity overload and selfcontradiction of"decentralization".Therefore,taking the practical experiences of arbitration institutions and third-party for-profit platforms as subjects,through the self-examination in current issues and the in-depth mining of potential risks,author explores the approaches to develop the blockchain technology in online arbitration in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.113