论国际礼让原则在美国法院域外取证中的适用--兼论中国企业应对之道  

On the Application of the Comity Principle in Cases Involving Taking Evidence Abroad at American Courts:With Advice on How Chinese Enterprises Should Respond to Orders to Disclose Evidence

作　　者：甘勇[1] GAN Yong(SchoolofLaw,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,Hubei,China)

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院/国际法研究所,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《石河子大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第6期54-62,共9页Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：国际礼让原则是美国冲突法的重要原则,该原则在美国法院的域外取证实践中也经常得到适用。该原则引入域外取证领域始于美国最高法院判决的罗杰斯案,经过判例发展,域外取证中的礼让分析框架日渐成熟,包括三个条件及七大因素。在美国法院处理的涉及中国企业的域外取证案件中,这些条件和因素得到了全面的分析和认定。我国企业在主张国际礼让应对美国法院域外取证时,应该注意这些条件和要素,作出适当的决策。Being an overriding principle in conflict of laws,the comity principle applies very often in cases involving taking evidence abroad relating to proceedings at American courts.Starting from Rogers case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of the U.S.A in which the principle was first introduced in the field of taking evidence abroad,the legal analysis conducted in applying the comity principle has evolved and ripened into definitive rules comprising of three conditions and seven factors.In cases in which American courts order Chinese enterprises to disclose evidence,these conditions and factors are fully analyzed and confirmed,thus Chinese enterprises should pay enough attention to these so that proper responses should be effectuated considering these rules.

关 键 词：域外取证 国际礼让 属人管辖权 利益分析 

分 类 号：D997[政治法律—国际法学]