涉驰名商标认定案件管辖问题研究  

Research on the Jurisdiction of Cases for the Identification of Well-known Trademarks

作　　者：金艺波 JIN Yi-bo(Law School of Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081,China)

机构地区：[1]中央财经大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《山西青年职业学院学报》2020年第4期62-66,共5页Journal of Shanxi Youth Vocational College

摘　　要：管辖权异议制度是我国民事诉讼法中对诉讼权利人利益进行保护的一项重要制度。然而,有别于普通的知识产权案件,我国对涉驰名商标认定案件的管辖权设置特殊,当事人对此类案件提出的管辖权异议,实务中未能形成统一的裁定标准。法院审理涉驰名商标认定案件,仅需在形式上审查案件是否涉及驰名商标认定,其认定的必要性与法院的级别管辖紧密联系,综合多种因素以确定管辖法院。对于案件中同时存在普通商标及驰名商标侵权的情况,应一并交由中级人民法院审理。诉讼标的额达到高级人民法院管辖标准的案件,高级人民法院有权管辖。Jurisdiction objection system is an important system to protect the interests of litigants.However,in respect of the jurisdictional objections raised by the parties in civil cases involving the determination of well-known trademarks,it has failed to form a uniform ruling standard in practice.This article starts with two cases of jurisdictional objections to the determination of well-known trademarks,and discusses the court’s review standards and forms of jurisdictional objections to cases involving the determination of well-known trademarks,and claims to confirm the relationship between the facts claimed by one party of the well-known trademarks and the facts requested issues.In addition,the author studied the criteria for judging the jurisdiction of cases involving the determination of well-known trademarks in two special cases,in order to provide a new way of thinking for the issue of jurisdiction in disputes involving the jurisdiction of well-known trademarks.

关 键 词：驰名商标认定 证明责任 审查标准 管辖权异议 

分 类 号：D922.43[政治法律—法学]