环境司法中社会学方法的合理运用  

Proper Use of Sociological Methods in Environmental Justice

作　　者：李彩虹[1] 晋海[1] LI Caihong(Law School,Hohai University,Nanjing 211100,China)

机构地区：[1]河海大学法学院,江苏南京211100

出　　处：《河海大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第6期99-108,112,共11页Journal of Hohai University：Philosophy and Social Sciences

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项(2018B21614)。

摘　　要：传统司法方法注重从逻辑结构和形式规则角度严格适用法律,但在解决新型的环境污染侵权案件时遇到了困难,致使审判效果不理想。在尊重传统的规范研究和逻辑推理方法的前提下,环境司法活动有必要在合理的限度内借鉴和运用社会学的一些方法评判证据、解释法律,以使环境法律更贴近社会现实。具体而言,宏观上,借鉴迪尔凯姆“用社会事实解释社会事实”的方法论,微观上,认定事实时,将环境案件放在当前的社会结构和社会背景中,通过必要的实地调查来查明真相;解释法律时,在具体情境中将经验和理性相结合做出价值判断,在法律的目的与原则之内力求达成最优的社会效果。Traditional judicial methods pay attention to the strict application of the law from the perspective of logical structure and formal rules,but they encounter difficulties in solving new types of environmental pollution tort cases,resulting in unsatisfactory trial results.On the premise of respecting the traditional normative research and logical reasoning methods,it is necessary for environmental judicial activities to learn from and use some sociological methods to judge the evidence and explain the law,so as to make the environmental law closer to the social reality.To be specific,macroscopically,we should draw lessons from Durkheim’s methodology of“explaining social facts with social facts”.Microscopically,when determining the facts,we should put environmental cases into the current social structure and social background,and find out the truth through necessary field investigations.When interpreting the law,we should combine experience with reason to make value judgments in specific situations,and strive to achieve the best social effect within the purposes and principles of the law.

关 键 词：环境司法 社会学方法 社会事实 价值判断 社会效果 

分 类 号：C912.82[经济管理]