检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]University of Turin,Turin,Italy
出 处:《Chinese Business Review》2020年第6期197-212,共16页中国经济评论(英文版)
摘 要:The paper emphasizes the true“generality”of the General Theory(GT)in the face of the dominant view,according to which Keynes’s theory is captured by“Keynesian outcomes”in axiomatic general equilibrium models due to market imperfections.However,it argues that the advocates of generality must make a serious effort to re-conceptualize the GT in a very broad perspective.One must understand both its limitations and why the generality debate after the GT has failed to reconsider it in a proper way and what to do to restore Keynes’s generality claim in the present context.This paper’s contribution is twofold.The first is to make a distinction between three different dimensions of the generality issue and suggest that Keynes failed to grasp their full significance because he was facing the Marshallian orthodoxy,rather than general equilibrium.The second contribution is to suggest that one way to restore Keynes’s generality claim is to stress that he belongs to an alternative paradigm that has several features in common with contemporary modernist revolution and with Einstein’s relativity theory in particular.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.58.166