检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹赛霞 CAO Sai-xia(Department of Rheumatology and Immunology,People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region,Hohhot 010000,China)
机构地区:[1]内蒙古自治区人民医院风湿免疫科,010000
出 处:《中国实用医药》2020年第35期105-107,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的研究分析吗替麦考酚酯(MMF)与环磷酰胺(CTX)在结缔组织病相关肺间质病变(CTD-ILD)治疗中的价值。方法 80例CTD-ILD患者,以随机数字表法分为对照组和实验组,每组40例。对照组患者采用激素+CTX治疗,实验组患者采用激素+MMF治疗。对比两组患者临床指标[血清肺表面活性蛋白D(SP-D)、肺表面活性蛋白A(SP-A)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)]、肺功能指标[肺一氧化碳弥散量占预计值百分比(DL-CO)、第1秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(FEV1%)、用力肺活量占预计值百分比(FVC%)]、不良反应发生情况。结果治疗后,实验组SP-D、SP-A、ESR水平分为(7.44±1.63)ng/L、(894.26±247.38)ng/L、(14.85±4.47)mm/h,均低于对照组的(9.51±2.37)ng/L、(1140.69±462.88)ng/L、(18.71±5.29)mm/h,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者用药前和用药1年后DL-CO%、FEV1%、FVC%水平组间与组内对比,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者不良反应发生率对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 CTD-ILD患者采用MMF治疗的不良反应发生率和肺功能改善情况与CTX治疗无较大差异,但对于改善SP-D、SP-A、ESR的效果显著,值得推广。Objective To study and analyze the value of mycophenolate mofetil(MMF)and cyclophosphamide(CTX)in the treatment of connective tissue disease-related interstitial lung disease(CTD-ILD).Methods A total of 80 CTD-ILD patients were divided into control group and experimental group according to random numerical table,with 40 cases in each group.Patients in the control group were treated with hormones+CTX,and patients in the experimental group were treated with hormones+MMF.The clinical indicators[surfactant protein D(SP-D),surfactant protein A(SP-A),erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR)],pulmonary function indicators[diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide as a percentage of predicted value(DL-CO),forced expiratory volume in the first second as a percentage of predicted value(FEV1%),and forced vital capacity as a percentage of predicted value(FVC%)]and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results After treatment,the levels of SP-D,SP-A and ESR of the experimental group were(7.44±1.63)ng/L,(894.26±247.38)ng/L and(14.85±4.47)mm/h,which were lower than(9.51±2.37)ng/L,(1140.69±462.88)ng/L and(18.71±5.29)mm/h of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before medication and 1 year after medication,there was no statistically significant difference in levels of DL-CO%,FEV1%and FVC%between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in incidence of adverse reactions between and within the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion The incidence of adverse reactions and improvement of pulmonary function in patients with CTD-ILD treated with MMF are not significantly different from those of CTX treatment,but MMF treatment has significant effects on improving SP-D,SP-A and ESR and is worthy of promotion.
关 键 词:吗替麦考酚酯 环磷酰胺 结缔组织病相关肺间质病变 不良反应
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.59.22.153