医疗知情同意权的合理配置  被引量:4

Rational Allocation of Medical Informed Consent Rights

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:陈传勇[1,2] CHEN Chuanyong(不详)

机构地区:[1]江西财经大学法学院 [2]广东金融学院法学院

出  处:《中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第1期37-52,共16页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)

基  金:国家社会科学基金项目“我国安宁疗护法律制度体系的构建研究”(项目编号:19BFX138)。

摘  要:医疗知情同意权是患者物质性人格权(生命权、身体权、健康权)的核心权能之一,相关法律、法规和行政规章对此进行了规定,但在权利配置上存在冲突。在一般医疗活动中,较之部分医疗行政管理规范确立的“并列同意模式”,《侵权责任法》确立的“补充同意模式”在逻辑上更加清晰,更能平衡患者与家属的利益,也符合司法实践趋势;在特殊情形下,例如终止妊娠和实施节育手术、人体器官移植、医疗试验、保护型医疗等医疗活动中,则需要根据特殊情形对配置模式作出相应调整。故医疗知情同意权的合理配置体系应是“一个原则+若干例外”。Informed consent right of medical treatment is one of the core rights of patients'material personality rights(right of life,right of body,right of health).It is stipulated by relevant laws,regulations and administrative rules,but there are conflicts in the allocation of the righs.In the general medical activities,compared with the"coordinate consent model"established by some medical administrative regulations,the"supplementary consent model"adopted by the Tort Law is more logically clear and can balance the interests of both the patients and their families,which is also the mainstream trend of judicial practice.Under special circumstances such as the termination of pregnancy and the implementation of birth control surgery,human organ transplantation,medical tests and protective medical treatment,the configuration mode should be adjusted accordingly.Therefore,the rational allocation system of medical informed consent should be"one principle plus several exceptions".

关 键 词:知情同意权 并列同意 补充同意 医疗决定 

分 类 号:D923.7[政治法律—民商法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象