检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱宇方[1] ZHU Yufang(Institute for German Studies,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)
出 处:《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2020年第6期64-72,共9页Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:新工业革命并非突如其来,工业生产方式的变化过程可追溯至20世纪70年代,即制造业从“福特主义”转向“后福特主义”。而20世纪70年代至今也是德国福利国家制度在二战后发展至高峰后开始遭遇问题、探索改革的时期。这两条发展线索之间不无关联:一方面,生产方式的变化使劳资关系从对抗逐步走向合作;另一方面,生产方式变化所引起的就业形态的灵活化使传统社会保障制度面临改革压力。反观历史,分析这两条线索之间的联系和互动关系,有利于沿着这条路径考察工业4.0带来的挑战,展望福利国家在这一背景下的发展前景。The new industrial revolution is not a sudden change.The changing process of the production mode can be traced back to the 1970s,which refers to the shift from“Fordism”to“post-Fordism”in the manufacturing industry.After the German welfare state system developed to its peak after World War II,it has encountered problems since the 1970s,and people have begun to explore reforms.These two development clues are interrelated:on the one hand,the changing of the production mode leads to a gradual shift from confrontation to cooperation between labor and capital;on the other hand,the flexibility of employment patterns caused by changing of the production mode makes traditional social security systems face reform pressure.Looking back at history and analyzing the connection and interaction between these two clues,we can examine the challenges brought by Industry 4.0 along this path,and look forward to the development prospects of the welfare state in this context.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.64.87