检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周静言[1] 杨宇立[2] ZHOU Jing-yan;YANG Yu-li(School of Economics,Eastern Liaoning University,118001;Institute of Economics,Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,200020)
机构地区:[1]辽东学院经济学院,118000 [2]上海社会科学院经济研究所,200020
出 处:《上海经济研究》2020年第12期22-41,共20页Shanghai Journal of Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目“坚持和完善中国特色社会主义基本经济制度研究”[20AZD011]。
摘 要:本文旨在比较研究中国、俄罗斯应对基本经济制度转型的政治条件、主要战役的顺序和得失,主要观点如下:⑴基本经济制度转型是需要支付成本的事业而非比试胆量的过程;⑵中国农村改革的成功得益于官民共有的历史经验,而俄罗斯没有这种历史经验;⑶中国先改价格、后改产权的转型顺序既得益于给定的政治体制,更得益于中央政府的正确管控;⑷中国赢得了最优化的转型效果,该过程理论上无疑与给定的政治体制之间存在着优化的结构性关系。The objective of the paper is to compare the political situations, sequence of main battles as well as the gains and losses of main battles between China and Russia when handling the transformation of the basic economic system. The main points includes:(1) The basic economic system transformation requires to pay costs instead of a courage competition;(2)China’s rural reform success derives from the historical experience shared by the official and the people, while Russia does not embrace such experience.(3)The transformation order in China that first changing prices and then property rights benefits is not only from the given political system, but also from the proper control of the central government;(4) China has enjoyed the optimal effects of the transformation, and theoretically, without doubt that there is an optimal structural relationship between the process and the given political system.
关 键 词:基本经济制度 市场环境 市场主体 转型过程管控 比较研究
分 类 号:F0-0[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222