释䙟  

The Interpretation on the Character“Wei”

作　　者：汤志彪[1] 孙欣[1] Tang Zhibiao;Sun Xin(Center for the Study and Application of Chinese Characters,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中国文字研究与应用中心,上海200062

出　　处：《语言科学》2021年第1期97-104,共8页Linguistic Sciences

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDB027);国家社科基金一般项目(15BZS046);教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD740009);国家社科基金一般项目(17BKG017);上海市教委科创重大项目(2019-01-07-00-05-E00048)资助。

摘　　要：上博简三《亘先》和清华简壹《楚居》、清华简柒《越公其事》习见一个内从衣,外也从衣的字,过去学者或释读作“袭”。事实上,从训诂和音韵学角度看,这个字应该释作“!”,在清华简《楚居》、《越公其事》简27中读作“回”,表示“还”“反”“归”等意思,在甲骨文中则读作“危”,《越公其事》中相关的字则读作“毁”或“危”表示毁败义;而在上博简《亘先》里,此字可与微部字押韵。There is a character,the internal component of which is a character“yi”(衣)and the outside is also the character“yi”,frequently occurring in the chapter Hengxian in the the Book Bamboo Slips of Chu State in the Warring States Collected by Shanghai Museum(vol.3),the chapter Chuju in the Book Bamboo Slips of the Warring States Collected by Tsing Hua University(vol.1)and the chapter[WT5BX]Yuegong Qishi in the Book Bamboo Slips of the Warring States Collected by Tsing Hua University(vol.7).In the past,all the scholars believed that the word should be read as“xi”(袭).In fact,from the aspects of critical interpretation of ancient Chinese texts and phonology,the character should be interpreted as“wei”(䙟).In the chapter of Chuju,No.27 bamboo slips in the chapter Yuegong Qishi,the word should be read as“hui”(回),meaning“to come back”or“to return”.The word should be read as“wei”(危)in the oracle-bone.The relevant word in the chapter Yuegong Qishi should be interpreted as“hui”(毁)or“wei”(危)meaning“defeated”.While in the chapter of“Hengxian”,the word rhymes with the words of the“wei”(微)rhyme.

关 键 词：上博简 清华简 䙟 回 

分 类 号：K877[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]