检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张云武[1] Zhang Yunwu(School of Public Administration,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018)
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2021年第1期91-101,158,共12页Zhejiang Social Sciences
摘 要:本文以数理模型公式化的形式,明确了教育水平与代际流动的关系。为了推导出不依赖于特定数值的一般性命题,采用了模型由2维度(教育水平与出身阶层)2等级(高和低)的要素构成以及教育水平高者优先流入到精英阶层的假设。将精英阶层的选拔机制设定为注重出身阶层的词典式次序模型和注重教育水平的教育至上模型。通过比较分析两个模型,明确了三个问题:(1)教育水平的提升导致代际上升流动的封闭性这一悖论现象的产生条件;(2)教育机会均等化与代际上升流动的关系;(3)根据模型的理论值,推导出相关的理论命题。最后,本文验证了模型的理论值与问卷数据获得的经验值的匹配度以及指出了今后需要研究的课题。In the form of mathematical model formula,the relationship between educational level and intergenerational flow is clarified.In order to derive a general proposition that does not depend on a particular value,the model is based on the assumption that 2 dimensions(educational level and class of origin)are2 levels(high and low)and that those with higher education levels are preferred to the elite.The selection mechanism of elites is set as a dictionary order model focusing on the class of origin and an educational supremacy model focusing on the level of education.By comparing and analyzing the two models,three problems are clarified:(1)the conditions for the paradox that the improvement of educational level leads to the close of intergenerational upward mobility;(2)The relationship between equalization of educational opportunities and the rising flow of generations;(3)The relevant theoretical propositions are derived from the theoretical values of the model.Finally,this paper verifies the match between the theoretical value of the model and the experience value obtained from the questionnaire data,and points out the problems that need to be studied in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249