浅论中医经典及其特征  

Brief Review on TCM Classics and the Traits

作　　者：王印螺 王乐鹏[1] WANG Yinluo;WANG Lepeng(Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100026,China)

机构地区：[1]北京中医药大学,北京100026

出　　处：《吉林中医药》2020年第12期1577-1579,共3页Jilin Journal of Chinese Medicine

基　　金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(188zs1747)。

摘　　要：中医"四大经典"之说在学术语境中欠确切谨严,应当将《素问》《灵枢》《难经》《神农本草经》《伤寒论》《金匮要略》等经典称为医学六经。从宋代以来经典流传的书籍制式和传承状况考察,《素问》《灵枢》不当合称《黄帝内经》,张仲景著作亦应分别称《伤寒论》《金匮要略》而不当合称《伤寒杂病论》。中医经典具备年代持久性、价值普适性、阐释延续性、功能扩展性等基本特征。经典提供了高于现实的思维模式、洞察医学本质的视角、原创的医学理论框架,因而久远地成为不同时代人们激发新思想的火石和培育新理论的种子。The"Four Classics"in traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)lacks exactness and rigorousness in the academic context.Instead,there should be six classics of medicine including Plain Questions(Su Wen),Spiritual Pivot(Ling Shu),On Difficult Issues(Nan Jing),Shen Nong’s Herbal Classic(Shennong Bencao Jing),Treatise on Febrile Diseases(Shang Han Lun),and Synopsis of Prescriptions of the Golden Chamber(Jingui Yaolüe).Judging by the book formats and heritage of classics since the Song Dynasty,Plain Questions(Su Wen)and Spiritual Pivot(Ling Shu)shouldn’t be collectively referred to as Huangdi’s Inner Classic of Medicine(Huangdi Neijing),nor should works of Zhang Zhongjing be collectively referred to as Treatise on Febrile and Miscellaneous Diseases,but Treatise on Febrile Diseases and Synopsis of Prescriptions of the Golden Chamber.TCM classics are persistent in time,universal in value,continuous in interpretation,and expanding in function.Classics have provided us with the thinking model above reality,insights into the nature of medicine and the original frame of medical theories,and have therefore been taken as the firestones striking sparks of new ideas and seeds of new theories.

关 键 词：中医经典 医学六经 经典特征 

分 类 号：Q256[生物学—细胞生物学]