何种乡土?何种政治?——百年《风波》批评回顾  

What Kind of Locality?What Kind of Politics?——A Review of the Criticism of Storm in A Teacup

作　　者：董腾宇 Dong Tengyu

机构地区：[1]重庆树人教育研究院,重庆401331

出　　处：《南京师范大学文学院学报》2020年第4期25-31,共7页Journal of School of Chinese Language and Culture Nanjing Normal University

摘　　要：每一代《风波》的研究者,都不自觉地把“乡土”和“政治”作为关键词。“乡土”摇摆于启蒙话语和阶级话语之间,决定了《风波》解读的二元立意;“政治”并没有从革命话语中剥离出来,导致作品成为辛亥革命或张勋复辟的据实解释,缺乏新的历史维度。本文通过对关键词的梳理,既揭示研究者塑造《风波》的不同面向,又重新阐释关键词,从而发现这种相互关系推动研究方式的更新,促成了乡村政治经验的诞生。以乡村主体性的重建,打破进化论的认识惯性,这也是《风波》在《呐喊》中获得独立意义的新角度。Every generation of researchers unconsciously use“locality”and“politics”as keywords in their studies of Storm in A Teacup.“Locality”swings between enlightenment discourse and class discourse,which determines the dualism of the interpretation of this novel;“politics”is not separated from the revolutionary discourse,resulting in viewing this novel as a factual interpretation of the Revolution of 1911 or Zhang Xun restoration,lacking of a new historical dimension.Through the combing of keywords,it not only reveals the different aspects of the researcher's shaping of Storm in A Teacup,but also reinterprets the keywords,thus discovering that this relationship promotes the renewal of research methods and promotes the birth of rural political experience.The reconstruction of the rural subjectivity to break the cognitive inertia of the theory of evolution is also a new perspective for Storm in A Teacup to gain independent meaning in Call to Arms.

关 键 词：《风波》批评史 乡土两重性 乡村政治经验 

分 类 号：I210.6[文学—中国文学]